​

• Claim: The Trump campaign colluded with Russia to influence the 2016 election.

• Reality: The Mueller Report, after extensive investigation, did not establish that the Trump campaign conspired or coordinated with the Russian government. While it did document Russian interference in the election and found multiple instances where Trump may have obstructed justice, the collusion narrative was not proven.

​

• Claim: Harris’s role was limited to diplomatic efforts and did not involve direct responsibility for the situation at the U.S. border.

• Reality: Despite the administration's claims, Harris had significant sway over decisions impacting the border. This includes diplomatic engagements that directly influence migration patterns and border security. Her role in negotiating and working with Central American leaders on migration policies means that her decisions had direct implications for the border situation, blurring the line between addressing root causes and managing the border itself.

• Claim: Trump referred to white supremacists and neo-Nazis as "very fine people" during a press conference after the Charlottesville rally in 2017.

• Reality: Trump’s statement was more nuanced. He condemned neo-Nazis and white nationalists explicitly and stated that there were "very fine people on both sides" in reference to those debating the removal of Confederate statues, not the extremists.

• Claim: Democrats assert that if Trump returns to power, he will push for a nationwide ban on abortion.

• Reality: He has not explicitly advocated for a nationwide abortion ban. Trump himself has stated that he believes the issue should be decided by states, not at the federal level and he believes in certain exceptions.

• Claim: Democrats have historically positioned themselves as the champions of the working class, advocating for labor rights, social welfare programs, and income equality.

• Reality: While the Democratic Party has traditionally been associated with working-class interests, their donor base and financial backing have increasingly come from wealthy individuals, large corporations, and powerful industries like Big Pharma and tech companies. They receive more funding than the Republicans from the named industries.

• Claim: Kamala Harris and the Biden administration have claimed credit for reducing insulin costs as part of their broader healthcare policy agenda, including the Inflation Reduction Act, which capped insulin prices at $35 per month for Medicare beneficiaries.

• Reality: During Trump's presidency, steps were taken to lower insulin prices, including a 2020 executive order that aimed to cap the cost of insulin for some Medicare recipients and initiatives to increase price transparency and competition within the pharmaceutical industry. These actions were part of Trump's broader efforts to reduce prescription drug prices.

​

• Claim: Republicans rejected a border bill to shut down the border for political benefit as they would not care about the actual well-being of Americans.

• Reality: Kamala Harris's "bipartisan border bill" allocated approximately $60 billion for Ukraine. This funding was part of a broader package that also addressed border security and other international aid, but the significant amount earmarked for Ukraine was a point of contention and discussion among critics and supporters alike. The bill was a Trojan Horse to fund Ukraine or at least frame the Republicans as only wanting to use the border for political benefits.

• Claim: Early reports on Hunter Biden's laptop were dismissed by many in the media and some Democratic figures as Russian disinformation.

• Reality: Subsequent reporting has confirmed that the laptop and its contents are authentic. Even major news outlets that initially dismissed the story have since acknowledged its legitimacy, although the full implications of the contents are still debated.

• Claim: Several Democratic leaders and media outlets claimed that Border Patrol agents on horseback were whipping Haitian migrants at the Texas border in 2021.

• Reality: Investigations later revealed that the agents were using reins to control their horses, not whips on migrants. The initial claims were based on misleading photos and were widely retracted.

1. RFK Jr.’s Censorship Allegations

• Claim: Democrats, including the Biden administration, claim to support free speech but have censored Robert F. Kennedy Jr. for his controversial views on vaccines and other issues.

• Reality: RFK Jr. has been a vocal critic of vaccines, and his views have led to significant controversy. Under the Biden administration, it has been reported that officials encouraged social media platforms to take action against what they considered misinformation, including some of RFK Jr.'s posts. Critics argue that this represents a direct contradiction to the administration’s stated commitment to free speech, as it involved governmental influence over private platforms to suppress certain viewpoints.

2. Collusion with Social Media Companies

• Claim: The Biden administration colluded with social media companies to censor content, despite publicly supporting free speech.

• Reality: Documents and communications released through various investigations and lawsuits have shown that the Biden administration pressured or worked closely with social media companies like Facebook and Twitter to remove or reduce the visibility of content they deemed as misinformation, particularly concerning COVID-19 and elections. Critics argue that this constitutes a form of censorship, infringing on free speech by using government influence to shape the information landscape.

• Claim: Democrats have long warned that Trump would abuse the justice system to target his political opponents if given the opportunity, portraying him as a threat to democratic norms.

• Reality: Critics argue that they themselves engage in similar tactics by attempting to marginalize and suppress dissenting voices within their own ranks, such as RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard. This includes legal challenges, efforts to keep RFK Jr. off ballots, and attempts to discredit or marginalize Gabbard and have now even put her on a domestic terrorist list.

• Claim: Democrats have long championed bodily autonomy, particularly in debates over reproductive rights, emphasizing the importance of personal choice over one's body without government interference.

• Reality: This principle was inconsistently applied during the COVID-19 pandemic, when many Democrats supported vaccine mandates that required individuals to receive the vaccine or face consequences like job loss or restricted access to public spaces. This criticism intensified when the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, which was initially part of the mandate, was paused due to rare but serious side effects, such as blood clots, leading to debates over the safety and ethics of such mandates. And it was even continued after simply updating the risk warnings.